top of page
Copy of RonanDonovan3x2_18.jpg

TAKE ACTION
TO PROTECT
GRAY WOLVES

Take action now to protect Gray Wolves and the Endangered Species Act as a whole. Right now, we are collecting signatures in support of California's SB1135 to establish a permanent coexistence program in the state. We also strongly encourage you to send a letter opposing H.R. 1897 which weakens the Endangered Species Act and could go to a House floor vote any day now!

TELL YOUR REP: NO ON H.R. 1897

Westerman’s dangerous anti-ESA bill is going to a floor vote in the House the week of April 13.

 

If passed, H.R. 1897 would strip away vital federal protections for Gray Wolves. Beyond the immediate threat to wolves, H.R. 1897 sets a dangerous precedent by weakening the Endangered Species Act (ESA) itself. By allowing Congress to bypass the scientific process, it opens the door for other vulnerable species to be stripped of protection based on industry pressure rather than biological facts. The bill is particularly risky because it includes a "no-court" clause, meaning citizens and scientists would be legally blocked from challenging these decisions, even if endangered species populations start to plummet.

It takes just two minutes to stand up for the Endangered Species Act. Use our quick and easy tool below to send a letter directly to your Representative. Just enter a few details and a short message about why you care to generate a personalized letter.
 

Once you hit SEND MESSAGE, you’ll be directed to your email to review and send. If this bill comes up for a vote, your Representative needs to hear from you. Make sure you’ve sent your letter today.

CALL OUR LAWMAKERS

The below Representatives could be key to blocking the wolf killing bill.  Call these lawmakers and tell them to vote NO on H.R. 1897.

NEED TIPS ON WHAT TO SAY? 

Calling a member of Congress is a powerful way to advocate for issues you care about. Here are some tips to make your call as effective as possible. Have fun, be polite, and remember to make the call your own! BEFORE THE CALL Take a few minutes to gather your thoughts and prepare what you want to say. We have provided a couple example scripts, but make it your own. Identify yourself, and be ready to provide your name, hometown, and possibly your ZIP code. Keep the call under 2 minutes. DURING THE CALL INTRO (if speaking to a staffer or leaving a voicemail): Hi, my name is [NAME], and I’m from [CITY/STATE]. I’m calling to strongly urge the Congressmember to publicly oppose H.R. 1897, the so-called “ESA Amendments Act.” KEY TALKING POINTS (choose 2–3 for your message): · This bill would weaken one of the most effective environmental laws in American history. The Endangered Species Act has helped prevent extinction for the vast majority of species under its protection. Gutting it now would put countless vulnerable species at greater risk. · H.R. 1897 is dangerous because it limits judicial review at exactly the moment accountability matters most. Courts are one of the few checks the public has when agencies or politicians make unlawful decisions about endangered species. Blocking review means fewer checks, less transparency, and more room for abuse. · This bill would make it easier to weaken protections and harder to challenge bad decisions in court. That sets a dangerous precedent: when industry and politics want fewer rules, endangered species and the ecosystems they depend on are the ones forced to pay the price. · The ESA protects more than individual animals. It protects habitats, food webs, and the ecological systems that keep land, water, and wildlife healthy. Weakening those protections does not just hurt one species — it destabilizes entire ecosystems. · This bill invites decisions driven by economics and politics instead of science. Endangered species policy should be based on the best available data, not on which industries want fewer safeguards or faster permits. · H.R. 1897 would make recovery harder for already imperiled species by weakening protections and making it easier to move species toward delisting before recovery is secure. That is not conservation — it is a rollback dressed up as reform. · Gray wolves are one example of what is at stake. Wolves still face relentless political attacks, and broader ESA rollbacks make it easier for species like wolves to lose protections before recovery is secure. Wolves help maintain healthier ecosystems and support biodiversity, but bills like this make science-based recovery harder. · Once Congress starts weakening the ESA for political convenience, it opens the door for more attacks on other species. Today it may be wolves, whales, or wolverines. Tomorrow it could be any species that stands in the way of profit or development. · The Endangered Species Act is a bipartisan legacy. It was signed into law under President Nixon and has long reflected the principle that protecting wildlife should rise above politics. · Protecting endangered species should never be about choosing profit over survival. Once a species is gone, it is gone for good. Congress should be strengthening safeguards, not weakening them. THINGS TO REMEMBER: If you have a personal connection to the Member of Congress or where they represent, emphasize that. FROM THEIR STATE/DISTRICT: Talk about the wildlife, landscapes, rivers, coastlines, forests, or outdoor spaces in their district that depend on strong environmental protections — and what is at stake for the local environment, recreation, and economy if those protections are weakened. If you have a personal connection to any of the key issues, emphasize that. BUSINESS OWNERS: Talk about running a business that depends on outdoor recreation, tourism, or healthy natural resources — and how weaker wildlife protections could harm your community and local economy. FARMERS/RANCHERS: If you are a farmer or rancher who depends on healthy land, clean water, pollinators, or balanced ecosystems, explain that weakening environmental protections creates long-term instability and puts more pressure on rural communities. Enhance Your Call! Howl! Ask your kid if they would like to call! CLOSING ASK: Please tell [Congress member NAME] to oppose H.R. 1897 and stand up for science, endangered species, and the public interest.

SIGN THE LETTER SUPPORTING SB1135

Add your name to Team Wolf's letter in support of SB1135, the California Wildlife Coexistence Act.

SB 1135, sponsored by Senator Blaskespear, would establish a permanent Statewide Wildlife Coexistence Program and Wolf-Livestock Coexistence and Compensation Program at the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, backed by approximately $10 million in funding. The bill would ensure communities and livestock producers have access to nonlethal deterrence tools, regional conflict specialists, and compensation. As wolves continue to expand across California, including the first wolf documented in Los Angeles County in over a century, this legislation is critical to ensuring that recovery and coexistence go hand in hand.

To the Committee on Water, Parks, and Wildlife,


On behalf of Team Wolf, a national coalition of advocates, scientists, and conservationists dedicated to the long-term protection and recovery of gray wolves, we are writing in strong support of Senate Bill 1135, the California Wildlife Coexistence Act.


California is at a pivotal moment for wolf recovery. At the same time, the evidence is clear that proactive nonlethal coexistence strategies are more effective than lethal management at reducing conflict. 


In late October 2025, CDFW captured and euthanized three adult gray wolves and shot a juvenile from the Beyem Seyo pack in Sierra Valley, the first state-authorized wolf killings since the species began its return to California. Conservation advocates noted that earlier intervention, including proactive nonlethal deterrence measures by ranchers, could have prevented the situation from reaching a lethal tipping point. A UC Davis study estimated the combined economic toll of the livestock losses and intervention efforts at $2.6 million over seven months. Rather than showing that coexistence does not work, the Beyem Seyo tragedy underscores the cost of relying on too little support, too late—exactly the gap SB 1135 is designed to address. 


Team Wolf strongly supports this legislation for three key reasons:


It codifies a proven approach. CDFW's prior Human-Wildlife Conflict program demonstrated that proactive, nonlethal, science-based conflict prevention works. That program won a state award for its effectiveness, yet it expired in 2024 when one-time funding ran out, leaving communities without the Regional Human–Wildlife Conflict specialists who served as trusted messengers during high-pressure situations. SB 1135 makes this program permanent, ensuring Californians are never again left without credible, science-informed support when conflicts arise.


It gets wolf-livestock coexistence right. As an organization that works on wolf policy across the country, we know firsthand that the single biggest factor in determining whether wolves and ranching communities can coexist is whether nonlethal deterrence tools and compensation are available, accessible, and properly structured. SB 1135 does this thoughtfully, requiring that at least 50 percent of any appropriated funds go toward nonlethal deterrence and making the use of preventive measures a condition of compensation eligibility. This incentivizes livestock producers to adopt proven prevention techniques while ensuring they are made whole when losses occur despite those efforts. California allocated $3 million in 2021 for a pilot compensation and deterrence program that was well received but ran out of funding, underscoring the need for the permanent program SB 1135 would establish.


It aligns with science. The scientific consensus is clear: indiscriminate lethal removal of native carnivores does not reduce human-wildlife conflict. In fact, new research shows that nonlethal coexistence methods are up to 100% more effective than lethal measures at reducing livestock depredation. What works is eliminating access to food attractants, such as unsecured garbage, pet food, bird feeders, and fallen fruit, deploying guard animals and electric fencing, and investing in the kind of regional conflict specialists and public education that SB 1135 would fund. CDFW's own decade-long wolf management report documents the agency's growing toolkit of nonlethal solutions and community outreach, and this bill ensures those tools remain available as California's wolf population continues to grow.


The California grizzly remains on the state flag even though it no longer exists in the wild—a stark reminder of what is at stake if the return of wolves to California is not given the support needed to succeed. California has a long history of conservation leadership and now has a chance to lead the nation again in showing that wolf recovery and thriving rural communities are not in conflict—and that with the right investment in coexistence, both can succeed.


For these reasons, we urge you and your colleagues to pass SB 1135 and send a signal that California is committed to science-based wildlife stewardship for the long term.


Sincerely,

[YOUR NAME]

State
Signature

TAKE ADDITIONAL ACTION.

TAKE ACTION ON SOCIAL

Use the below social media digital toolkit to raise awareness and demand that our lawmakers block H.R. 845!

See the whole toolkit HERE >

Connect with the PACK.

Connect with us via our newsletter or on social media for regular updates and action alerts from Team Wolf!

Contact Us.

Want to know more about Team Wolf? Have a comment? Fill out the form below or send us an email at info@teamwolf.org today!

  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • bsky red_edited
  • X

Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page